Отечественная и зарубежная психология религии: параллели и пересечения в прошлом и настоящем - Татьяна Владимировна Малевич

Atran S. In God we trust: the evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Barrett J. L. Born believers: The science of children’s religious belief. N. Y.: Simon and Schuster, 2012.

Barrett J. L. Cognitive science of religion: looking back, looking forward // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2011. № 50 (2). P. 229–239.

Barrett J. L. Exploring the natural foundations of religion // Trends in Cognitive Science. 2000. № 4 (1). P. 29–34.

Barrett J. L. Why Santa Claus is not a god // Journal of Cognition and Culture. 2008. № 8 (1–2). P. 149–161.

Barrett J. L., Richert R. A. Anthropomorphism or preparedness? Exploring children’s God concepts // Review of Religious Research. 2003. № 44. P. 300–312.

Bering J. M. The belief instinct: the psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. N. Y., 2011.

Bering J. M. The folk psychology of souls // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2006. № 29. P. 453–498.

Bering J. M. Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: the natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary // Journal of Cognition and Culture. № 2 (4). P. 263–308.

Bloom P. Descartes’ baby: how the science of child development explains what makes us human. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2004.

Boyd R. Realism, antifoundationalism, and the enthusiasm for natural kinds // Philosophical Studies. 1991. № 61 (1). P. 127–148.

Boyer P. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.

Boyer P. Religious Ontologies and the Bounds of Sense: A Cognitive Catalogue of the Supernatural // Philosophy in Wartime: A Collection of Readings prepared in conjunction with the Seminar: Religion, Revolution, Terrorism and War (University at Buffalo Spring Semester 2002). URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/courses01/rrtw/Boyer.htm, accessed on 01.02.2016.

Boyer P Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003. № 7 (3). P. 119–124.

Boyer P. What makes anthropomorphism natural: intuitive ontology and cultural representations // The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 1996. № 2 (1). P. 83–97.

Boyer P., Barrett H. C. Domain specificity and intuitive ontology. The handbook of evolutionary psychology / Ed. D. M. Buss. Hoboken, N. J: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

Casler K., Kelemen D. Developmental continuity in teleo-functional explanation: reasoning about nature among Romanian Romani adults // Journal of Cognition and Development. 2008. № 9 (3). P. 340–363.

Chiao J. Y., Immordino-YangM. H. Modularity and the cultural mind: Contributions of cultural neuroscience to cognitive theory // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013. № 8 (1). P. 56–61.

Cohen E., Barrett J. L. Conceptualizing spirit possession: ethnographic and experimental evidence // Ethos. 2008. № 26 (2). P. 246–267.

Corriveau K. H., Chen E. E., Harris P. L. Judgments about fact and fiction by children from religious and nonreligious backgrounds // Cognitive Science. 2015. № 39 (2). P. 353–382.

Evans E. M. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: creation versus evolution // Cognitive Psychology. 2001. № 42. P. 217266.

Flack J., Waal F. de. Any animal whatever: Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. Evolutionary origins of morality: cross disciplinary perspectives / Ed. L. D. Katz. Thorverton: Imprint Academic, 2002. P. 1–30.

Gervais W. M., Henrich J. The Zeus problem: why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods // Journal of Cognition and Culturew. 2010. № 10 (3). P. 383–389.

Grayling A. C. Against all gods: six polemics on religion and an essay on kindness. L.: Oberon Books, 2007.

Griffiths P. E. What is innateness? // The Monist. 2002. № 85 (1). P. 70–85.

Guthrie S. E. Animal animism: evolutionary roots of religious cognition // Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion / Eds. I. Pyysiainen, V. Anttonen. L.: Continuum, 2002. P. 38–67.

Guthrie S. E. Faces in the clouds: a new theory of religion. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1993.

HamerD. The God gene: how faith is hardwired into our genes. N. Y.: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2005.

HirschfeldL. A., Gelman S. A. Toward a topography of mind: an introduction to domain specificity // Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture / Eds. L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. P. 3–35.

Hodge K. M. Context sensitivity and the folk psychology of souls: why Bering et. al. got the findings they did // Is religion natural? / Eds. D. Evers, M. Fuller, A. Jackelen, T. Smedes. N. Y.: T & T Clark International, 2012. P. 49–63.

James W. Thought before language: a deaf-mute’s recollections // The Philosophical Review. 1892. № 1. P. 613–624.

Keil F. C. Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Cambridge, 1979.

Kelemen D., DiYanni C. Intuitions about origins: purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature // Journal of Cognition and Development. 2005. № 6 (1). P. 3–31.

LinquistS., Machery E., Griffiths P. E., StotzK. Exploring the folkbiological conception of human nature // Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 2011. № 366. P. 444–453.

Mameli M., Bateson P. An evaluation of the concept of innateness // Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. 2011. № 366. P. 436–443.

McCauley R. N. Why religion is natural and science is not. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Newberg A., Waldman M. R. Born to believe: God, science, and the origin of ordinary and extraordinary beliefs. N. Y.: Free Press, 2007.

Petrovich O. Understanding of non-natural causality in children and adults: a case against artificialism // Psyche en Geloof. 1997. № 8. P. 151–165.

Piaget J. Child’s Conception of the World. London: Routledge, 2001.

PowellR., Clarke S. Religion as an evolutionary byproduct: A critique of the Standard // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2012. № 63 (3). P. 457–486.

Prinz J. J. Is the mind really modular? // Contemporary debates in cognitive science / Ed. R. J. Stainton. Malden: Blackwell, 2006. P. 22–36.

Pyysiainen I. How religion works: towards a new cognitive science of religion. Leiden: Brill, 2006.

Pyysiainen I. On the “innateness” of religion: a comment on Bering // Journal of Cognition and Culture. 2003. № 3 (3). P. 218–225.

Sampson G. The “Language Instinct” debate. L.: A&C Black, 2005.

SamuelsR. Nativism in cognitive science // Mind & Language. 2002. № 17 (3). P. 233265.

Schloss J. P. Darwinian explanations of morality: accounting for the normal but