Отечественная и зарубежная психология религии: параллели и пересечения в прошлом и настоящем - Татьяна Владимировна Малевич

Шахнович М. М. Когнитивная наука и исследования религии // Государство, религия, Церковь в России и за рубежом. 2013. № 3. С. 32–63.

Шахнович М. М. Л. Я. Штернберг и «наука о религии» // Материалы конф. «Лев Штернберг – гражданин, ученый, педагог: к 150-летию со дня рождения». СПб., 2012. С. 190–199.

Штернберг Л. Я. Первобытная религия в свете этнографии. Л., 1936.

Animism and Animatism // Encyclopedia of Religion. 2005. Vol. 1. P. 362–368. Anthropomorphism // Ibid. Vol. 1. P. 388–392.

Atran S. A. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universal and cultural particulars // Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 1998. Vol. 21. № 4. P. 547–609.

Barrett J. L. Cognitive Constrains on Hindu Concepts of the Divine // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1998. Vol. 37. № 4. P. 608–619.

Barrett J. L. Cognitive Science, Religion and Theology: From Human Minds to Divine Minds. West Conshohocken: Templeton Press, 2011.

Barrett J. L. Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion // Trends in Cognitive Science. 2000. № 4. P. 29–34.

Barrett J. L. Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion // Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. 1999. Vol. 11. P. 325–339.

Barrett J. L. Why Santa Claus is Not a God // Journal of Cognition and Culture. 2008. Vol. 8. № 1–2. P. 149–161.

Barrett J. L. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2004.

Barrett J. L., Keil F. C. Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts // Cognitive Psychology. 1996. Vol. 31. № 3. P. 219–247.

Barrett J. L., Richert R. A. Anthropomorphism or Preparedness? Exploring children’s God concepts // Review of Religious Research. Vol. 44. № 3. P. 300–312.

Blakemore S.-J., Boyer P., Pachot-Clouard M., Meltzoff A., Segebarth C., Decety J. The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain // Celebral Cortex. 2003. № 13. P. 837–844.

Bogoraz W. Religious ideas of primitive man, from Chukchee material // International Amerikanisten-Kongress. Bd. I. Stuttgart, 1904. S. 129–136.

Bolle K.W Euhemerus and euhemerism // Encyclopedia of Religion / Ed. by L. Jones. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 2882–2884.

BoyerP. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas. A Cognitive Theory of Religion. California: University of California Press, 1994.

Boyer P. What Makes Anthropomorphism Natural: Intuitive Ontology and Cultural Representation // The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 1996. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 83–97.

Encyclopedia of Religion / Ed. by L. Jones.Vol. 1. 2005.

Fink G. R.,Halligan P. W., Marshall J. C., Frith C. D., Frackowiak R. S. J., Dolan R. J. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest andthe trees? // Nature.1996. № 382. P. 626–628.

Guthrie S. E. A Cognitive Theory of Religion // Current Anthropology. 1980. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 181–203.

Guthrie S. E. Animal Animism: Evolutionary Roots of Religious Cognition // Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion / Eds. by I. Pyysiainen, V. Anttonen. London: Continuum, 2002. P. 38–67.

Guthrie S. E. Anthropology and anthropomorphism in religion // Religion, Anthropology and Cognitive Science / Ed. by H. Whitehouse, J. Laidlaw. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2007. P. 37–62.

Guthrie S. E. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. N. Y., 1993. – X+290.

Happ F., Brownell H., Winner E. Acquired ‘theory of mind’ impairments following stroke // Cognition. 1999. № 70. P. 211–240.

Menon V.,White C. D., Eliez S., Glover G. H., Reiss A. L. Analysis of adistributed neural system involved in spatial information, novelty, andmemory processing // Human Brain Mapping. 2000. № 11. P. 117–129.

Сведения об авторах

Антонов Константин Михайлович – д-р филос. наук, доцент, зав. кафедрой философии религии и религиозных аспектов культуры богословского факультета ПСТГУ.

konstanturg@yandex.ru

Горевой Дмитрий Александрович – магистр религиоведения, член Молодежной ассоциации религиоведов (Киев, Украина).

garryvays@mail.ru

Дамте Давид Соломонович – канд. филос. наук, науч. редактор изд-ва «Академический Проект» (Москва).

damte_d@mail.ru

Кожевников Денис Дмитриевич – науч. сотр. Центра психологии религии пстгу.

d.d.kozhevnikov@gmail.com

Малевич Татьяна Владимировна – канд. филос. наук, науч. сотр. Института философии РАН.

t.v.malevich@gmail.com

Фолиева Татьяна Александровна – канд. филос. наук, доцент кафедры «Профсоюзное движение, общие и гуманитарные дисциплины» Волгоградского филиала ОУП ВПО «Академии труда и социальных отношений», науч. сотр. Центра психологии религии ПСТГУ.

tatiana_folieva@yahoo.com

Contributors

Konstantin Antonov – Head ofthe Department of Religious Studies at the Theological Faculty of St Tikhon’s Orthodox University.

konstanturg@yandex.ru

Dmytro Horyevoy – Master of Religious Studies, Member of the Youth Association of the Study of Religions (Kyiv, Ukraine).

garryvays@mail.ru

David Damte – PhD, science editor at “The Academic Project” (Moscow publishing house).

damte_d@mail.ru

Denis Kozhevnikov – Research Fellow, the Center for Psychology of Religion, St. Tikhon's Orthodox University.

d.d.kozhevnikov@gmail.com

Tatiana Malevich – PhD, Research Fellow, the Institute of Philosophy, the Russian Academy of Sciences.

t.v.malevich@gmail.com

Tatiana Folieva – PhD, associate professor of the Department «The Trade Union Movement, General and Humanitarian Disciplines» at the Academy of Labour and Social Relation, Volgograd subsidiary; Research Fellow, the Center for Psychology of Religion, St. Tikhon's Orthodox University.

tatiana_folieva@yahoo.com

Summary

This book documents the results of several investigations in the problem of Russian adaptation of the contemporary Western psychology of religion. Each of us was trained in various fields of science – psychologists, religious scholars, philosophers and theologians – understands that psychology of religion must not lag behind sociological studies in this area, as it happens in the contemporary Russian science. Psychological studies of religion were significantly eleborated and extended recently in scientific endeavours all over the world. The methods are changing rapidly, and we have to keep up with the pace. Contributors of the present volume believe that psychological investigation of such issues as religious experience, religious motivation, religiosity, spirituality, mystic and mysticism, faith and beliefs, prayer and blessing cannot be considered as less significant than sociological inquires of religious communites and faith-based organizations as well as denominations. These were the reasons for giving the impetus to this project. We suggest that the overall picture of Russian religious life nowdays may result only from applying the integrated approach to it.

The book consists of Preface and three